Call us now:
A Small Traffic Violation Can Lead to Serious Criminal Charges
A recent Florida appellate decision serves as an important reminder that seemingly minor vehicle equipment violations can provide law enforcement with a lawful basis to stop a vehicle—and that stop can quickly escalate into a serious criminal investigation. And remember – don’t put any blue lights on your vehicle no matter what.
In Cadet v. State, Florida’s Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the denial of a motion to suppress after police stopped a vehicle because the driver displayed an illuminated blue Uber sign on the dashboard. The stop ultimately led to the discovery of fentanyl and cocaine and resulted in convictions carrying an eight-year prison sentence.
For drivers who work in rideshare services such as Uber or Lyft, the case highlights an often-overlooked provision of Florida traffic law: blue lights are generally reserved for law enforcement vehicles.
What Happened?
Police observed Tamara Cadet driving with an illuminated blue Uber sign visible through the front windshield.
Believing the sign violated section 316.2397 (the relevant Florida Statute controlling lighting devices on vehicles), officers conducted a traffic stop.
During the stop, an officer reported smelling marijuana coming from the vehicle. A search followed, and officers discovered fentanyl and cocaine inside the center console.
Cadet was charged with:
- Trafficking in fentanyl
- Possession of cocaine with intent to sell
She entered a no contest plea while preserving her right to appeal the denial of her motion to suppress.
The Legal Issue
Cadet argued that police lacked probable cause to stop her vehicle because an illuminated Uber sign is not a prohibited “lamp,” “device,” or “light” under Florida law.
Specifically, she argued:
- The Uber sign was not part of the vehicle itself;
- It was not a lamp designed to illuminate something;
- The Legislature could not have intended to prohibit rideshare drivers from displaying company identification signs designed to improve rider safety.
The State responded that the statute broadly prohibits blue lights and that the Uber sign plainly qualified as a “device” displaying blue light.
Florida’s Blue Light Statute
Section 316.2397 provides:
“It is expressly prohibited for any vehicle or equipment, except police vehicles, to show or display blue lights.”
The statute also prohibits vehicles from displaying blue lights visible from directly in front of the vehicle.
Unlike certain provisions dealing with other colors of lights, the statute contains no exception for rideshare companies, commercial drivers, or private citizens displaying blue lights.
Why the Court Rejected the Challenge
The Second District focused on the plain language of the statute.
The court explained that when statutory language is clear, courts do not rewrite the law based on perceived public policy concerns.
Looking at ordinary dictionary definitions, the court concluded that an illuminated Uber sign is unquestionably a “device” because it is a piece of equipment designed to serve a particular purpose.
The court emphasized that the statute does not merely prohibit blue “lamps.” It also prohibits blue-light “devices.”
Because the Uber sign displayed blue light visible from the front of the vehicle, the officer had probable cause to believe a traffic infraction had occurred.
That was enough to justify the stop.
Any Valid Traffic Violation Can Justify a Stop
Florida courts apply an objective standard when evaluating traffic stops.
If an officer has probable cause to believe a traffic law has been violated, the stop is generally lawful regardless of the officer’s subjective motivations.
As the Florida Supreme Court explained in Holland v. State, the primary question is whether probable cause existed for the stop.
This means that even seemingly minor violations can lead to lawful investigations that uncover evidence of more serious offenses.
What This Means for Criminal Defense Cases
Although Cadet involved a blue Uber sign, the broader lesson applies to many criminal investigations.
Defense attorneys routinely examine:
- Whether a traffic stop was lawful;
- Whether officers correctly interpreted the statute allegedly violated;
- Whether the stop was unlawfully prolonged;
- Whether any subsequent search was supported by probable cause;
- Whether evidence obtained after the stop should be suppressed.
In some cases, a misunderstanding of a traffic statute can invalidate a stop entirely.
Here, however, the appellate court concluded that the officer correctly interpreted the statute and therefore had probable cause to initiate the stop.
Key Takeaway
Florida’s prohibition on blue lights is broader than many drivers realize.
According to the Second District Court of Appeal, an illuminated blue Uber sign constitutes a prohibited “device” displaying blue light under section 316.2397. Because the sign provided probable cause for a traffic stop, evidence discovered afterward was admissible and the defendant’s convictions were upheld.
If you have been charged with a crime after a traffic stop, the legality of the stop itself may be one of the most important issues in your case. An experienced criminal defense attorney can evaluate whether officers had lawful grounds to stop, detain, search, or arrest you.
Charged After a Traffic Stop?
Matt Landsman is a Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyer who represents clients throughout Gainesville, Alachua County, and North Florida in DUI, drug, firearm, and serious felony cases. If you have been arrested after a vehicle stop, contact Landsman Law for a consultation to discuss possible suppression issues and available defenses.
Why Retaining an Attorney Matters
Criminal Defense Lawyer Matt Landsman at Landsman Law helps people accused of crimes in Gainesville, Alachua County, Bradford County, Levy County, Gilchrist County, Putnam, Marion and surrounding areas of north Florida. If you need help for yourself or a loved one, contact Criminal Defense Attorney Matt Landsman for a free consultation today. For help with any Criminal Matter from Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyer Matt Landsman – CALL NOW
If you’re accused of any criminal matter, retaining an attorney is critical to protecting your rights. These cases will involve constitutional questions and concern allegations of misconduct or are sensitive in nature, requiring a skill, preparation and experience. For expert legal help, contact Gainesville Defense Lawyer Matt Landsman to protect your rights today.