Alachua County Courthouse Criminal Justice Center in Gainesville, Florida

GAINESVILLE • ALACHUA COUNTY • NORTH FLORIDA

Gainesville Burglary Lawyer

Defense for burglary of dwellings, structures, vehicles, armed burglary, burglary with assault or battery, and related property-crime allegations.

Board Certified
Criminal Trial Lawyer

20+ Years
Criminal-Defense Experience

Burglary Defense
Intent • Identification • Search & Seizure

Hero photo: Alachua County Courthouse, Criminal Justice Center, Gainesville, Florida — Ebyabe / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.5.

Florida Burglary Resource Center

Burglary Charges, Evidence & Defense Guides

Explore Landsman Law’s guides to burglary of dwellings, structures and vehicles, burglary tools, trespass, investigations, and constitutional issues.

What Is Burglary Under Florida Law?

Florida § 810.02 defines burglary, for offenses after July 1, 2001, as entering a dwelling, structure, or conveyance with the intent to commit an offense inside unless the premises are open to the public or the person is licensed or invited to enter. Burglary can also involve remaining after a lawful entry in specifically defined circumstances, including remaining surreptitiously with criminal intent, remaining after permission to remain has been withdrawn with criminal intent, or remaining to commit or attempt a forcible felony.

Burglary does not require a completed theft. The intended offense can be theft, battery, criminal mischief, or another crime. The State must still prove the required entry or remaining and the required criminal intent.

Consent, invitation, whether a location was open to the public, whether permission was withdrawn, and when any alleged criminal intent was formed can therefore become central defense issues.

Florida Burglary Charges

Types of Florida Burglary Charges

Burglary can be charged at different felony levels depending on the place entered, whether anyone was present, and whether the State alleges a weapon, assault, battery, significant damage, or another aggravating circumstance.

Burglary of a DwellingEntry into or remaining in a qualifying dwelling with the required criminal intent.
Burglary of a StructureAlleged entry into a building or qualifying structure with intent to commit an offense inside.
Burglary of a ConveyanceVehicle and other conveyance cases involving alleged entry and criminal intent.
Burglary With Assault or BatteryAn allegation that an assault or battery occurred during the burglary can substantially increase exposure.
Armed BurglaryAllegations involving a weapon or explosive during the offense can elevate burglary to a first-degree felony punishable by life.
Burglary With Significant DamageSpecified property damage during the burglary can affect the offense classification.
Emergency Vehicle BurglaryFlorida law contains enhanced treatment for burglary involving certain emergency vehicles.
Burglary Involving Controlled SubstancesBurglary allegations involving specified controlled substances can trigger special statutory provisions.

Florida Burglary Penalty Levels

Florida burglary is a felony offense. Under § 775.082, a third-degree felony is generally punishable by up to 5 years, a second-degree felony by up to 15 years, and a first-degree felony by up to 30 years unless the statute authorizes a greater maximum. Section 810.02 expressly makes specified first-degree burglary offenses punishable by a term of years up to life.

3°

Third-Degree Felony

Generally applies to unarmed burglary of an unoccupied structure or conveyance when no higher statutory circumstance applies.

2°

Second-Degree Felony

Includes burglary of a dwelling, occupied structure or conveyance, authorized emergency vehicle, and certain controlled-substance theft burglaries.

1°

First-Degree Felony, Punishable by Life

Applies when a burglary includes assault or battery, being or becoming armed with a dangerous weapon or explosive, or specified motor-vehicle or property-damage circumstances.

Burglary of a Dwelling

Florida treats burglary of a dwelling more seriously than burglary of an unoccupied structure or vehicle. A dwelling can include a house, apartment, or other qualifying building or conveyance designed for nighttime lodging, whether or not someone is actually present at the time.

The defense may dispute whether the place legally qualifies as a dwelling, whether the defendant was invited or licensed to enter, whether permission was withdrawn, whether the accused actually entered, and whether there was intent to commit another offense inside.

Burglary of a Vehicle or Conveyance

A conveyance includes motor vehicles and other statutorily defined forms of transportation. An alleged burglary can occur even when a vehicle was unlocked; forced entry is not a required element.

Vehicle cases often involve surveillance video, fingerprints or DNA, possession of property taken from the vehicle, statements, proximity, identification, and whether the vehicle was occupied. The precise scope of any alleged entry also matters.

Burglary of a Structure

A structure generally includes a building of any kind, temporary or permanent, that has a roof, together with statutory curtilage. Whether the structure was occupied at the time of entry can change the degree of the offense.

Commercial buildings, sheds, storage buildings, offices, warehouses, and other roofed structures may fall within the statute depending on the facts. If the premises were open to the public, or the person was licensed or invited to enter, the initial-entry theory of burglary may not be satisfied unless another statutory remaining theory applies.

Intent to Commit an Offense Inside

Burglary requires more than unauthorized entry. The State must prove the intent required by § 810.02. In many cases, that means proving the accused entered—or remained under one of the statutory theories—with intent to commit some additional offense inside.

Florida § 810.07 provides that stealthy entry into a structure or conveyance without the owner’s or occupant’s consent is prima facie evidence of intent to commit an offense. That evidentiary rule does not eliminate the State’s ultimate burden of proof, and the circumstances surrounding the entry remain important.

Evidence relevant to intent can include the time and manner of entry, statements, possession of tools, conduct inside, items moved or taken, communications, surveillance, and an explanation consistent with a noncriminal purpose.

Possession of Burglary Tools

Under § 810.06, possession of a tool, machine, or implement with intent to use it—or allow it to be used—to commit burglary or trespass is a third-degree felony.

The object itself does not have to be a specialized burglary device. The important question is the alleged intent to use the item to facilitate burglary or trespass. Ordinary tools can therefore become evidence only when the surrounding facts support the required criminal intent.

Trespass vs. Burglary

Trespass in a structure or conveyance under § 810.08 generally involves unauthorized entry or remaining without the additional criminal intent required for burglary.

That difference can be critical. If the State cannot prove intent to commit another offense inside, the evidence may fail to establish burglary even if unauthorized entry occurred. The precise facts and charging alternatives should be evaluated case by case.

Evidence Review

Evidence in a Burglary Case

Burglary cases often turn on whether the prosecution can reliably prove entry, identity, criminal intent, possession, and the surrounding circumstances.

Surveillance VideoBusiness cameras, apartment systems, doorbell video, traffic cameras, and private security footage.
Fingerprints & DNACollection location, contamination, transfer, timing, comparison methodology, and significance.
Possession of PropertyTiming, exclusive control, explanation, recovery location, pawn records, resale activity, and ownership.
Phone & Location DataCell-site information, GPS, app data, account records, device attribution, and timestamps.
Witness IdentificationLighting, distance, opportunity to observe, lineup procedures, prior descriptions, and certainty.
Statements to PoliceRecorded interviews, Miranda issues, voluntariness, omissions, context, and alleged admissions.
Scene & Entry EvidenceDoors, windows, locks, damage, access points, footprints, tools, photographs, and scene processing.
Ownership & Access RecordsKeys, leases, permission, prior access, employment, public access, relationship history, and occupancy.

Defense Issues

Defenses and Legal Issues in Florida Burglary Cases

The defense should focus on the statutory elements and the actual evidence rather than the label placed on the accusation.

Consent or InvitationPermission to enter can be central when the State alleges an unlawful entry or remaining.
Premises Open to the PublicPublic access and the scope of any invitation can affect whether the statutory entry requirement is established.
No Intent to Commit an OffenseBurglary generally requires proof of the specified criminal intent connected to entry or remaining.
Mistaken IdentificationVideo quality, eyewitness evidence, clothing, location data, forensic evidence, and alibi information may be important.
Mere Presence or AssociationPresence near a location or association with another person does not by itself establish every element of burglary.
Insufficient Possession EvidencePossession of property can be circumstantial evidence, but timing, control, explanation, and other proof still matter.
Illegal Search or SeizureEvidence obtained through an unlawful stop, search, warrant, seizure, or digital examination may be challenged.
Unlawfully Obtained StatementsCustody, interrogation, Miranda, coercion, promises, and recording context can affect admissibility.

Search, Seizure, and Burglary Investigations

Burglary investigations can involve vehicle stops, home searches, phone searches, warrants, surveillance footage, pawn records, DNA collection, fingerprints, clothing, tools, and property seizures.

Defense counsel may need to examine whether police had reasonable suspicion or probable cause, whether consent was voluntary, whether a search-warrant affidavit established probable cause, whether officers exceeded the warrant’s scope, and whether digital or physical evidence was properly seized and authenticated.

If key evidence was obtained through an unconstitutional search or seizure, a motion to suppress may materially affect the prosecution.

Burglary Defense in Gainesville, Alachua County & North Florida

Burglary investigations in Gainesville may involve the Gainesville Police Department, Alachua County Sheriff’s Office, University of Florida Police Department, apartment-complex surveillance systems, business security departments, vehicle owners, or other witnesses and agencies.

Landsman Law also represents clients in Bradford, Gilchrist, Levy, Union, Columbia, Marion, and Putnam Counties.

Why Choose Landsman Law?

Matt Landsman is a Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyer with more than 20 years of criminal-defense experience. Burglary cases can require detailed litigation involving criminal intent, identification, possession of property, forensic evidence, digital records, search warrants, and constitutional motions.

Landsman Law represents clients from investigation and first appearance through motions, negotiations, evidentiary hearings, trial, sentencing, and appeal.

Posted on Google Google
Bradley Hall profile picture
Bradley Hall
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Thank you Mr. Landsman. Definitely one of the best. If your looking for results, give Matt a call. Great service, stays in contact throughout the whole process, and the results are life saving. I cant thank you enough Mr. Landsman.
Posted on Google Google
Jeff D profile picture
Jeff D
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
We will forever be grateful for Matt and his excellent guidance during a tenuous time for our family. He is competent, compassionate, and most importantly, ethical. Thank you Matt.
Posted on Google Google
Lauren Curry profile picture
Lauren Curry
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Matt represented me and I was never disappointed. His tenacity and experience are impeccable. He maintains a positive vibe which always helped me keep the faith. He does know the law and is respected in the courtroom. In the end he won my case and every single dime spent was well worth it. He literally helped me believe in myself again.
Posted on Google Google
Steven “OmegaLibra” Snooks profile picture
Steven “OmegaLibra” Snooks
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Landsman Law Great free consultation. Super helpful.
Posted on Google Google
Al Timeter profile picture
Al Timeter
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I had a criminal and civil matter. Mr Landsman handled the criminal matter. Even though he did not usually handle the particular civil area, he made an exception in order to help me. However, I decided I would go with a former judge thinking he was more qualified. Huge mistake. I regret not staying with Mr. Landsman. He was confident, competent and very gracious when I reconnected with him and told him I had made a huge mistake by hiring another attorney. I regret not having stayed with Mr. Landsman after dealing with two other attorneys.
Posted on Google Google
Austin Surphlis profile picture
Austin Surphlis
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Mr. Landsman was super helpful in a pinch and gave great advise in a stressful time. Thank you, Mr. Landsman!
Posted on Google Google
Penny Cason profile picture
Penny Cason
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I owe my second chance in life to Matt Landsman. He went beyond what was expected and for that I am forever thankful. His professionalism is unmatched. If you're looking for an attorney that will fight for you and your best outcome... Landsman Law is the right choice. THANK YOU, THANK YOU MATT!!!
Posted on Google Google
Ramai Barsaleau profile picture
Ramai Barsaleau
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Matt was extremely helpful and provides excellent representation. Incredibly professional, personable, and takes the time to understand exactly what you need for your situation. Would highly recommend giving his office a call for a consultation.
Posted on Google Google
William Cook profile picture
William Cook
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
One of the most polite folk I have ever met. Even though he could not represent me he told me exactly what I needed to do. Thanx
Posted on Google Google
Desirae Thomas profile picture
Desirae Thomas
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Mr. Landsman was my uncles criminal court attorney. He was very professional and knowledgeable during court. He exceeded expectations.

Frequently Asked Questions About Florida Burglary Charges

Is burglary the same as breaking and entering?

Not exactly. Florida burglary does not require breaking a door or window. Entry can be through an unlocked opening. The State must prove the statutory entry or remaining plus the required intent to commit an offense.

Can I be charged with burglary if nothing was stolen?

Yes. A completed theft is not required. The State may allege that the accused entered or remained with intent to commit theft or another offense inside.

What is the difference between burglary and trespass?

Trespass generally requires unauthorized entry or remaining. Burglary adds the required intent to commit another offense inside, or a qualifying unlawful remaining under § 810.02.

What makes burglary of a dwelling more serious?

Florida classifies unarmed burglary of a dwelling as a second-degree felony even when no one is present. The statute treats dwellings more seriously than unoccupied structures or conveyances.

When can burglary be punishable by life?

Section 810.02 makes burglary a first-degree felony punishable by a term of years up to life when specified circumstances apply, including assault or battery during the burglary, being or becoming armed with a dangerous weapon or explosive, or certain qualifying damage.

Can possession of ordinary tools become a burglary-tools charge?

Potentially. Section 810.06 focuses on possession plus intent to use the tool or implement to commit burglary or trespass. The nature of the object and the surrounding evidence both matter.

Can burglary evidence be suppressed?

Potentially. If police obtained property, tools, phone data, DNA, statements, or other evidence through an unconstitutional search, seizure, warrant, or interrogation, the defense may seek suppression.

Does possession of allegedly stolen property automatically prove burglary?

No. Possession can be circumstantial evidence, but the State must still prove the elements of burglary. Timing, control, explanation, identification, and the rest of the evidence remain important.

Speak With a Gainesville Burglary Lawyer

If you have been accused of burglary of a dwelling, structure, vehicle or conveyance, armed burglary, burglary with assault or battery, possession of burglary tools, or a related trespass offense, Landsman Law can review the evidence and available defenses.

Call (352) 664-9671 for a consultation.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.